| 
        In
      the last column (See Archives), we discussed the general regulatory
      requirements for Class I, Class II and Class III medical devices. 
      This time, we will discuss the adulteration and misbranding and False and
      Misleading Labeling General Controls requirements for medical devices.  
      General
      Controls were established by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 to give
      the FDA the basic authority to regulate of devices to ensure their safety
      and effectiveness.   General Controls apply to all devices
      regardless of their classification status. Some devices have been exempted
      from General Control Provisions. 
      We have already discussed
      (See Archives) two General Controls: Establishment Registration and
      Medical Device Listing.  Now, let us discuss the some of the others. 
       
        - 
          
Adulteration 
          
      
          
       
      Adulteration for medical devices was first defined in
      Section 501 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938 (FD&C
      Act).  In 1976, the Medical
      Device Amendments added additional provisions. You will understand some of
      these provisions better later when we discuss in more detail the different
      type of FDA submissions. 
      According to these provisions, a device is
      adulterated if: 
      
        - 
          
      It includes any filthy, putrid or decomposed substance   
        - 
          
If it is prepared, packed or held under unsanitary conditions   
        - 
          
Its container is composed, in whole or part, of any poisonous or deleterious substance  
        - 
          
It contains, for the purposes of coloring only, an unsafe
      color additive  
        - 
          
Its strength differs from, or its purity or quality falls
      below, that which it claims to represent.  
        - 
          
It
      is subject to a performance standard and does not comply with all the
      requirements of the standard;  
        - 
          
It
      is a Class III device and fails to conform to the requirements for an
      approved premarket approval application or a notice of completion of a
      product development protocol  
        - 
          
It
      is a banned device  
        - 
          
It
      is in violation of good manufacturing practice requirements (GMP)  
        - 
          
It
      fails to comply with an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)  
       
      
      If you are a manufacturer of a medical device and market your products in
      the United States, it is critically important that you follow FDA’s
      Quality Systems Regulation.  See http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/qsr/03desgn.html#introduction
      .  Contained in this regulation are the GMP requirements of section
      520(f) of the Act as well as design validation requirements, which were
      added by the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990.  If your manufacturing
      facility does not comply with GMPs, your products could be considered to
      be “adulterated”!  We will talk more about this important
      regulation later. 
      
        - 
          
Misbranding
          
          
       
      Misbranding provisions
      are found in Section 502 of the FD&C Act. These are the first seven
      bullets below and apply both to devices and drugs. Additional provisions
      were added by the Medical Device Amendments applicable to just devices. A
      device is deemed to be misbranded if: 
      
        
          - 
            
The name of the
            place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, and  
          - 
            
An accurate
            statement of the quantity of contents in terms of weight, measure,
            or numerical count.  
         
      
        Reasonable variations
        and exemptions for small packages may be permitted. 
       
      
        - 
          
Any word, statement, or other required information is not prominently placed on the labeling or
      not clearly stated so as to be read and understood by the ordinary
      individual under customary conditions of purchase and use.  
        - 
          
It is for use by man and
      contains any quantity of a narcotic or habit forming substance, unless its
      label bears the name and quantity or proportion of the substance or
      derivative and the statement "Warning - may be habit forming."  
        - 
          
Its label does not bear adequate directions for use. The
      label must include warnings against use in certain pathological conditions
      or by children where its use may be dangerous to health, or against unsafe
      dosage or methods or duration of administration or application. Adequate
      directions and warnings must be present when it is necessary to protect
      the health of the user. Exemptions to this provision may be obtained. The
      phrase "adequate directions for use" pertains to
      over-the-counter drugs and device.  
        - 
          
It is dangerous to health when used in the dosage or
      manner, or with the frequency or duration prescribed, recommended, or
      suggested in the labeling.  
        - 
          
It does not comply with the color additive provisions
      listed under Section 706 of the FD&C Act.  
        - 
          
The device's established name (if it has one) or its name
      in an official compendium, or any common or usual name, is not prominently
      printed in type at least half as large as that used for any proprietary
      name or designation. Exemptions from this provision may be granted.  
        - 
          
A restricted device offered for sale in any State uses
      false or misleading advertising, or is sold, distributed, or used in
      violation of restricted device regulations. (A Restricted device is a
      device for which the FDA Commissioner, by regulation, under Title 21 of
      the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Sec. 801.109 or otherwise under
      section 520(e) of the FD& C Act, has restricted sale, distribution, or
      use only upon the written or oral authorization of a practitioner licensed
      by law to administer or use the device or upon such other conditions as
      the Commissioner may prescribe).  
       
      A restricted device manufacturer, packer, or
      distributor fails to include in all advertisements or other descriptive
      materials: 
      
        - 
          
A true statement of
          the device's established name, prominently printed, and 
         
        - 
          
A
          brief statement of the intended uses of the devices and relevant
          warnings, precautions, side effects, and contradictions. 
         
        - 
The device commercially distributed without FDA concurrence on a Section 510(k) submission.
 
        - The device is subject to a performance standard and it
      does not bear the labeling prescribed in that standard.
 
        - There is a failure or refusal to comply with any
      requirement prescribed under section 518 (Notification and Other
      Remedies); to furnish any material or information required by or under
      Section 518; or to furnish any material or information requested by or
      under Section 519 (Records and Reports on Devices).  (We will discuss this later)
 
       
      
        - 
          
False
          or Misleading Labeling 
          
            
       
      A drug
      or device is misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any
      particular (FD&C Act).  The labeling must bear adequate
      directions for use and any warnings needed to ensure the safe and
      effectiveness use of the device It is important to understand that
      "labeling" includes the label and any other written, printed, or
      graphic material that accompanies a device and any of its wrappers or
      containers. Operating and servicing instructions are also considered to be
      labeling.  Most, if not all advertising, is considered to be
      labeling.  In fact, even the signs and hand-outs at an exhibit booth
      are regarded as labeling!  If any of these claims extended your
      intended use beyond what was cleared by the FDA, your product could be
      deemed to be “misbranded”!  The same is true for your website! 
      The FDA actively monitors these areas. 
      The FDA has a number of
      useful guidance documents that explain labeling requirements in greater
      detail. For example, see http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/470.pdf,
      http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/g91-1.html 
      and http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/labeling.html
      .  My favorite guidance document is http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dsma/897.pdf. 
      This document is entitled “Write it Right” and includes valuable
      advice on how to write instruction manuals so that users can better
      understand them.
      
       
      In the next column, we
      will continue with our discussion of General Control requirements. 
      In the meantime, remember there are no stupid questions.  There are
      only stupid answers.  So, it’s my problem not yours if you have a
      question! 
      
       
      Norman F. Estrin, PhD,
      RAC
      
       
      January 26, 2003
      
      
                    | 
                  
                    
                      
            | 
    
            
                    
             | 
                       
                      
            | 
                    If you  have
                    questions related to the contents of this column, please
                    write to Dr Norman Estrin at yourFDAconsultant@medisourceasia.com
                    and he will try to answer you.  This column is for you
                    and we welcome your suggestions on how to improve it.  
             | 
                       
                      
            
                    
                      
            | 
                     
                    Dr. Norman Estrin
                     is a
                    recognized authority in the medical device and cosmetic
                    industries.  He has had over 30 years of experience in
                    directing scientific and technical and regulatory programs
                    in these industries.  He is Regulatory Affairs
                    Certified (“RAC”) by the Regulatory Affairs Professional
                    Society. Dr. Estrin is the founder of ESTRIN CONSULTING
                    GROUP, INC. (ECG).  ECG offers cost-effective,
                    experienced consulting to medical device firms on FDA-
                    related issues.  Its Services include preparing 510(k)
                    and other FDA submissions, regulatory strategy development   
                    and acting as  agent and  official correspondent for non-U.S.
                    medical device companies.
                     
             | 
                       
                      
            | 
             
            For more information, contact him
                    at 
 yourFDAconsultant@medisourceasia.com
            
                    or visit his website: http://www.yourFDAconsultant.com
             
             | 
                       
                     
             | 
                       
                     
                   |